Search for: "MERCK SHARP "
Results 201 - 220
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
Day 2 and 3 of the hearing brought premature reports that the the Board of Appeal would be referring questions on priority to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA), with Day 4 ultimately bringing the conclusion that Broad Institute's appeal would be dismissed, due to their patent being found to lack priority.SpecialKat Chijioke Okorie examined the decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and 2… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:36 pm
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme, No. 15-55873, 2015 WL 4645605 (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others | IP… [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in… [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:34 pm
Likewise after voluntary licensing efforts with Merck failed, Brazil issued CL for AIDS drug Efavirenz, but due to lack of technological expertise, they had to import the drug. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case C-325/14 | COFIX,… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
Elizabeth McCuskey has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-9169-11, ALT-L-9166-11; ATL-L-9142-11; ATL-L-9168-11; ATL-L-9157-011, at 3 (N.J. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:39 am
Merck, the maker of Gardasil, does not believe that Gardasil could have caused the events. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
EPO - Get your house in order - understand how applications have changed over the last 12 months, and how your company needs to adapt to gain first time patent approval 2009 confirmed speakers include: Bo Hammer Janssen, Senior Patent Counsel, Novozymes Nicolas Ruiz, Head of IP, Esteve Dr Mandar Kodgule, Head, Intellectual Property and Strategic Planning, Wockhardt Ltd Dr William Heggie, CSO, Hovione James Horgan, Assistant Counsel, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Ltd Dr… [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 1:56 pm
Here is a list of direct-acting antivirals currently available in the US: Daklinza (daclatasvir) -- Bristol-Myers SquibbEpclusa (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir) -- Gilead SciencesHarvoni (ledipasvir and sofosbuvir) -- Gilead SciencesOlysio (simeprevir) -- JanssenSovaldi (sofosbuvir) -- Gilead SciencesTechnivie (ombitasvir and paritaprevir and ritonavir) -- AbbvieViekira Pak (dasabuvir and ombitasvir and paritaprevir and ritonavir) -- AbbvieViekira Pak XR (dasabuvir and ombitasvir and paritaprevir and… [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme, 796 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
A couple of days ago, we watched the lovely “St. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Here is the letter in full: Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.Attention: Lou Ann Eader, Ph.D.Director, Worldwide Regulatory AffairsP.O. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] – Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP | Green claims and branding |… [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
