Search for: "MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 201 - 220
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Together with Opinions in the Cases Decided at January Term, 1837, Arising on the Restraints on the Powers of the States (1837) Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (1891) William H. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
It wasn’t until District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14] The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15] By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
Miller, 425 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Miller, 425 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:21 am
As the Court of Appeals in Gorman noted, the fact that the transactions between defendant and residents of the District of Columbia occurred in cyberspace “is not some mystical incantation capable of warding off the jurisdiction of courts built from bricks and mortar. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
The two new cases are Miller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:44 am
IES Commercial, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Between Miller and Heller: The Second Amendment in the Modern EraChapter 9. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Hedgepath, 607 A.2d 1238, 1247 & n.8 (D.C. 1992); Miller v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
The District of Columbia federal courts are a frequent forum for litigating FDA issues, and they’ve been pretty friendly to the First Amendment so far.There’s also a helpful discussion of the issue in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:14 am
Gaston (Miller & Zois) will discuss how to set-up & present a MIA claim and pitfalls and minefields in the Circuit Court Financial Discovery of Defense Experts post Falik v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:14 am
Gaston (Miller & Zois) will discuss how to set-up & present a MIA claim and pitfalls and minefields in the Circuit Court Financial Discovery of Defense Experts post Falik v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
Gaston (Miller & Zois) - will discuss how to set-up & present a MIA claim and pitfalls & minefields in the Circuit Court Financial Discovery of Defense Experts post Falik v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
Gaston (Miller & Zois) - will discuss how to set-up & present a MIA claim and pitfalls & minefields in the Circuit Court Financial Discovery of Defense Experts post Falik v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:45 am
City of Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Decision in full:United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
