Search for: "MONROE v. US " Results 201 - 220 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
The court also entices us with a footnote in State v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In the Matter of Teamsters Local 445 v Town of Monroe: Certain civil service positions in the classified service are placed in the "exempt" class reflecting the duties of the position are of a confidential nature and requires personal qualities that cannot practicably be tested by an examination. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In the Matter of Teamsters Local 445 v Town of Monroe: Certain civil service positions in the classified service are placed in the "exempt" class reflecting the duties of the position are of a confidential nature and requires personal qualities that cannot practicably be tested by an examination. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
  They told the Parks to remove the kennels, and when they didn't, the Forest Service sued in the case of US v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The recent decision of Mr Justice Warby in the High Court of Justice in Monroe v Hopkins is the latest instance of Twitter defamation. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Yes, said Monroe County Supreme Court Justice Richard A. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Sam L. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Sam L. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:16 am by Jeremy Saland
The collective weight of the allegations along with the statutory presumption permits reasonable cause to believe that defendant had the intent to use the box cutter unlawfully against another (see e.g., People v Monroe-Francis, 51 Misc 3d 1202 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; cf. [read post]