Search for: "MOORE v DOES 1 TO 25" Results 201 - 220 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) British Broadcasting Corporation v Sugar, heard 17 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Khader v Aziz and Davenport Lyons, heard 19 May 2010 (Sir Anthony May P, Carnwath and Moore-Bick  LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited,… [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Limited, heard 11 to 12 May 2010 (Sedley and Rimer LJJ and Sir Scott Baker) The British Broadcasting Corporation -v- Sugar, heard 17 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Khader v Aziz and… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:27 am by Gilles Cuniberti
” Section 103(2)(b) of the Act implements the second part of Article V (a)(1) of the New York Convention in English law. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
ROOTS The Legality of an American Slavery Introduction February 1 is known as National Freedom Day in the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
We rejected Jimenez’s arguments that (1) the Agreement is not subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)[2] because post-injury agreements between a seaman and his employer are invalid under Section 5 of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act; (2) the Agreement does not meet the standards applied in Garret v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[3] Opponents argue that because the primary function of cheerleading is not competition, it does not meet the qualifications of a sport.[4] The answer to this debate depends on your definition of a sport.[5] The NCAA, the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
No. 31 September Term 2003 (Motion for Stay of Execution and Supporting Exhibits, Exhibit 9, Appendix B, filed June 1, 2004, motion denied, State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by partners at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.) [read post]