Search for: "MOORE v. U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT"
Results 201 - 220
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Khuzami outlined the following plans: Creating a “Seaboard Report” for individuals — that is, a public policy statement that will set forth standards under which to evaluate an individual’s cooperation; Expediting the process by which the Division Director is delegated authority to submit immunity requests to the Department of Justice; Exploring ways to provide witnesses early on in appropriate cases an oral assurance that the Division does not intend to… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The U.S. has taken a different approach. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
