Search for: "MacMillan v. MacMillan"
Results 201 - 220
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Bendezu of Pence and MacMillan, Laramie, Wyoming.Date of Decision: March 1, 2011Facts: After the Respondent Hospital Board filed a complaint against him, Petitioner filed a counterclaim against the Hospital. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:20 am
Davidson (Defendant): Greg Weisz and Megan Overmann Goetz of Pence & MacMillan, Laramie, Wyoming.Date of Decision: February 18, 2011Facts: Two brothers, Daniel Davidson and Chester Davidson, agreed to partition their ranch in 1982. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
Lewis of Pence and MacMillan LLC, Laramie, Wyoming.Date of Decision: January 20, 2011Facts: This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the defendant in a worker’s compensation co-employee liability suit.Appellant and Appellee were employed by a mining company. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
New York, however, is at the other end of the spectrum which has a much narrower protection under Article 5, Section 51 of their Civil Law Statute and by virtue of Pirone v MacMillan where the Second Circuit held that the right derived from privacy and not from publicity, and therefore there were no transferable rights of publicity following death of the individual.Typically, where the potential plaintiff is domiciled when they die can create a lot of difficulties dependent on the… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:33 am
Gregory Weisz of Pence and Macmillan, Laramie, Wyoming.Date of Decision: December 1, 2010Facts: In documents signed by Nina H. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H.… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
The case is assessed in the Human Rights Law Review article, "Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia: The European Court of Human Rights and Trafficking as Slavery. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
., 2010.Constitutional LawKF4550 .T873 2010Why the Constitution matters / Mark Tushnet.Tushnet, Mark V., 1945-New Haven, Conn. : Yale University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4550.Z9 L578 2010Keeping faith with the Constitution / Goodwin Liu, Pamela S. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
” Viguers v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am
Basingstoke [England] ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:44 pm
In Wallop v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm
In Caswell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
She is a long-standing contributor to the Class 46 weblog of trade mark organisation MARQUES.Annsley Merelle Ward (Gallant Macmillan) has a background in chemical engineering and studied intellectual property at postgraduate level under Sir Hugh Laddie at UCL before training as a solicitor. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Despite the Defendant’s arguments that the claim only arose because it was contractually obliged to indemnify the insured and that therefore the claim was contractual in nature, the Court, citing Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
