Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 201 - 220
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Subsection 1 states: (1) The land comprised in the site of the central garden of Parliament Square (which, at the passing of this Act, is vested in the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport) is by this subsection transferred to and vested in Her Majesty as part of the hereditary possessions and revenues of Her Majesty. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
The Court then turns to whether Plaintiffs proved that those forms of injury are fairly traceable to Secretary Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 census and whether they are redressable by a favorable decision. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Politicians on both sides of the aisle have criticized the decision by Maine’s secretary of state and urged that the courts overturn it. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Bank v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
ROBERTS, In Her Official Capacity as Interim Secretary of State of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee, IRA WILLIAM McCOLLUM, JR., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
Sellers did state in the Coyle article that he thinks '"our clients remain resolute in their belief that statements by the secretary of Agriculture that he wants to settle [the] case are ones they can rely on. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
After all, the school stated in writing that a main reason for Perich’s termination was her threatened lawsuit. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
”) What Mad Men doesn’t say is that abortion remained illegal (except in rare circumstances) in New York until 1970 (three years before Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:18 am
On Monday, California state attorney general Xavier Becerra and officials from 18 other states sent a letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross threatening a lawsuit if the Census Bureau includes a question about citizenship on its main 2020 Census form. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm
The consultation relied on to make the designation was, however, conducted a little in advance of this, in August 2008.The claimants (who are a small group of professional landlords acting with the support of another 341 of their peers) now seek to quash the designation on the basis that Hyndburn misled the Secretary of State as to the nature of their consultation and also that the consultation they carried out was inadequate.The main ground relied on by Hyndburn at the… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change [20.09.2013], Mansfield County Court, in which District Judge Davies, having heard submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of the Defendant (represented by Nabarro LLP) and held that NIHL is not a disease within the meaning of CPR 45.23 and therefore the 62.5% success fee did not apply. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
