Search for: "Manning v. Campbell" Results 201 - 220 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
 Since the coming into force of the HRA and the designation of breach of confidence as the appropriate vehicle for the recognition of individuals’ Article 8 ECHR privacy rights in the form of the new tort of misuse of private information (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22), the court’s power to grant an interim injunction in any case where the ‘relief … if granted, might affect the exercise of the Convention right to freedom of expression’ has… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Notes that the Supreme Court provided the entire lyrics of both songs involved in Campbell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Henley, 62, a rocker and political activist behind the Walden Woods Project (1990), filed suit--Don Henley & Mike Campbell v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
’ Hypocrisy arguments This is not dissimilar to the hypocrisy argument run by MGN in the UK in Campbell. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:46 am by Nathan
Campbell went to the other end of the parking lot, swinging at the old man with every step. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:45 am by Jon Hyman
Some GINA Issues to Consider – from Prima Facie Law Blog Man Wins Pregnancy Discrimination Suit (Seriously.) [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:20 am by Dianne Saxe
Jackie Campbell and Dianne Saxe [i] Health Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
 The trial judge in Campbell v MGN was Mr Justice Morland since retired and in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Baroness Hale did note, however,  in para. 94, If a Sikh man wears a turban or a Jewish man a yamoulka, we can readily assume that it was his free choice to adopt the dress dictated by the teachings of his religion. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:28 am
No, all you need to do is know when to go with a dissent from another district:We recognize that shortly after Campbell, the First District Court of Appeal, in Jefferson v. [read post]