Search for: "Mark A. Strauss"
Results 201 - 220
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 7:34 pm
Of course, that steady decline is hardly an accurate measure of whether US manufacturing is doing well or poorly, and good economists like Cato's Dan Ikenson and AEI's Mark Perry have repeatedly noted that, in every measure except employment, the US manufacturing sector has been dominating. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
Marshall also considered Levi Strauss v Abercrombie & Fitch and the degree of similarity which was needed in order to establish confusion. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Previously relying on the requirement that a mark be “identical or nearly identical” to the plaintiff’s famous mark for dilution to exist, the 9th Circuit in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:24 am
Levi Strauss vs. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Instead, in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court opinion which found Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. did not dilute Levi Strauss’s registered mark, the “Arcuate” design. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
Levi Strauss appealed. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
Last week’s Levi Strauss v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
On Monday, February 8, 2011, the Ninth Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which had held that Levi Strauss failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence that Abercrombie & Fitch's Ruehl pocket stitching design is likely to cause dilution by blurring of Levi Strauss' famous Arcuate pocket stitching design because it had not established that "[Abercrombie] is making commercial use of a mark that… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:50 pm
We know him now as Levi Strauss. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
Levi Strauss reasoned that if it couldn’t compete in the high-end market, it could at least prevent these newer brands from infringing on its arcuate and tab trademark and diluting these marks. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:54 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld partners L. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:54 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld partners L. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
(Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Gibson Guitar – Gibson Guitar sues Paper Jamz for trademark infringement: Gibson Guitar v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:44 pm
The third is the much-noticed TNR essay by Mark Lilla, observing that Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss are much debated theorists among China's elite political and social theorists and intellectuals. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
The third is the much-noticed TNR essay by Mark Lilla, observing that Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss are much debated theorists among China’s elite political and social theorists and intellectuals. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:50 am
Several years ago, the soprano Deborah Voigt lost a contract with Covent Garden to sing in Strauss’s “Ariadne auf Naxos” because of her weight. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 52 A.D.3d 370, 374, 860 N.Y.S.2d 78, 82 (1st Dep't 2008), or, where rather than being merely relevant, "the privileged documents are indispensable to a party's claims or defenses. [read post]
