Search for: "Mark E. Howe" Results 201 - 220 of 7,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2019, 4:29 am
" In order to assess how consumers would perceive the phrases sought to be registered, the Board looks to the specimens of use and to the evidence of record showing the phrases as used.Examining Attorney Lauren E. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
Let's see how you do with them, keeping in mind that the Board affirms, by my calculation, some 90% of these refusals. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by John L. Welch
How would you apply the test to these marks: LONDON SOHO NEW YORK for cosmetic bags; and JPK PARIS 75 & Design for "sunglasses; wallets, handbags and purses, travel bags, suitcases; belts, shoes, sunglasses; wallets, handbags and purses, travel bags, suitcases; belts, shoes? [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 10:42 am by Bill Marler
FDA is continuing to investigate to learn more about how the E. coli bacteria could have entered the water and ways this water could have contaminated romaine lettuce in the region. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 1:07 pm
There the chef serves a dish that reproduces “Riso, oro e zafferano” under the name “Risotto oro e zafferano, omaggio a Marchesi” ("Rice, Gold and Saffron, A tribute to Marchesi"). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
Breaking its string of Section 2(e)(4) affirmances, the TTAB reversed a refusal to register the mark VEASY for "plant and flower seeds; live plants and flowers; live tropical plants, orchids and vandas, being orchids," finding that the USPTO had failed to carry its burden to prove that the mark is primarily merely a surname. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 4:43 am by Annette Demers
Sincerely, [Original Signed By] Madeleine Meilleur Attorney General c: Mark Spakowski, Chief Legislative Counsel Susan Medrzan, Manager, e-Laws/Editorial Services [read post]
17 Sep 2006, 2:24 pm
Mark Steyn, in the Chicago Sun Times, here, takes note of the carefully passive tone of the 9-11 five year remembrances. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
Because this ruling comes from the Federal Circuit it controls the how the Trademark Office deals with applications for color marks. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am by Guest Barista
In addition to leaving open the question of how to set the per article penalty, the standard in Forest Group fails to address how the penalty should be assessed if the act of false marking does not involve a product that is falsely marked, but only involves an advertisement that falsely identifies the advertised product as being patented. [read post]