Search for: "Mark Fish v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 5:27 pm
This decision comes close on the heels of Lum v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
Taiwanese Deputy Foreign Minister Bruce Linghu announced a media tour of Taiping (Itu Aba), which took place on Wednesday, as part of a larger diplomatic blitz in advance of the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
Enerco Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72 (Case Comment here). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
Citing Perry v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Background The case, O.P.T. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
United States (the “fish case”). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The denial of review in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
As the court in Potts v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
So a practical victory went to Saucy Fish because it had gone into the market with its brand foremost in its mind and having invested upfront in its trade mark portfolio. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
And just out is Peter Graham Fish’s Federal Justice in the Mid-Atlantic South: United States Courts from Maryland to the Carolinas, 1836–1861 (Carolina Academic Press, 2015). [read post]
