Search for: "Mark v. Mark" Results 201 - 220 of 34,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by randal shaheen
In a much anticipated decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held in Stauffer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:30 pm
Not too many Irish Trade Mark cases hit the Irish Courts and when they do, the in-depth analysis which the author provides to the leading cases in areas such as passing off (McCambridge v Joseph Brennan Bakeries), genuine use (Compagnie Gervais Danone v Glanbia Foods Society Ltd) and comparative advertising (Aldi Stores (Ireland) Ltd. v Dunnes Stores) is for the practitioner and students alike transcending differing needs. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:45 am
This was a decision by Mrs Recorder Michaels who sits as an appointed person in appeals from hearing officers in the Trade Marks Registry under s.77 of the Trade Marks Act 1977. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:53 am by Karen Monteith
  The Court applied the test for a public authority, as clarified by the Federal Court of Appeal in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
In doing so, the Supreme Court rejected the result of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Person's Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 1:09 am
 Jane LambertIntellectual Property Intellectual Enterprise Court (Mr Nicholas Caddick KC) Match Group LLC v Muzmatch Ltd. [2022] EWHC 941 (IPEC) 22 April 2022This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Author Basher EyreLicence Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 GenericSource Wikipedia Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) KBF Enterprises Ltd v Gladiator Nutrition 3.0Ltd and Others [2018] EWHC 3041 (IPEC) This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
The first was what constitutes genuine use for the purpose of s.6A of the Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division  (Mr Justice Birss) Nicoventures Holdings Ltd v The London Vape Company Ltd [2017] EWHC 3393 (Ch) (21 Dec 2017)  On 26 Oct 2016, Nicoventures Holdings Limited applied to register the above trade mark for: electronic cigarettes; cartridges for electronic cigarettes; liquids for electronic cigarettes; cigarettes containing tobacco substitutes; tobacco [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:35 am by Matt Osenga
  The Federal Circuit specifically declined to address this question last year in Stauffer v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by David Canton
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its decision in the case of Masterpiece v Alvida which clarified some trade-mark issues, particularly on the issue of confusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:40 pm
  The idea of the review is avoid the ideological component of the Chicago v. [read post]