Search for: "Market Merchandisers, Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am
The first week, they will review Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark Int’l, Inc., which also presents a momentous transactional question: When a firm holding a patent sells a product to which the patent applies, does the sale necessarily “exhaust” its rights to enforce the patent as to that product? [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:17 am
Wal-Mart Settles Claims That It Mislabeled Plastic Products as “Biodegradable” or “Compostable” Wal-Mart Stores Inc. settled claims brought by multiple California district attorneys that the superstore marketed plastic products online and in stores as “biodegradable” or “compostable. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:17 am
Wal-Mart Settles Claims That It Mislabeled Plastic Products as “Biodegradable” or “Compostable” Wal-Mart Stores Inc. settled claims brought by multiple California district attorneys that the superstore marketed plastic products online and in stores as “biodegradable” or “compostable. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:29 am
” Shoe Mart Factory Outlet, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Products marketed under AVELA’s licenses employ iconic film characters’ pictures to associate the products with Warner’s films, not to copy the film itself. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
Other online design-your-own merchandise shops such as Zazzle, Inc., potentially have more aggressive vetting processes. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Houston College of Law, Inc., No. 16-CV-1839 (S.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Thus, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:05 pm
It is no secret; the Disney Corporation is a marketing and merchandising powerhouse. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
Case citation: ZW USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:47 pm
Christmas Inc. asked Customs and Border Protection to reconsider is HQ H258442 (Aug. 18, 2016). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
Victims of Telemarketing Scam to Receive More Than $1.3 million in Refunds from FTC The FTC is sending out more than 6,000 checks totaling more than $1.3 million to individuals defrauded by Oro Marketing, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:56 am
Kohls Department Stores, Inc., 160 F. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:34 pm
See In re Watercraft Superstore, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:34 pm
See In re Watercraft Superstore, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
” Shoe Mart Factory Outlet, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
For example, our Advertising and Marketing Law casebook covers the FTC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:17 am
., Inc., (“Mars Petcare”) has agreed to settle FTC allegations that the company falsely advertised its Eukanuba dog food. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 4:02 pm
Australian Olympic Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
