Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
(citing B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:38 am
Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., 2021 U.S.P.Q.2d 785 (TTAB 2021) [precedential]. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Cybersecurity Attacks: Regulatory and Practical Approach Towards Preventing Data Breach and Cyber-Attacks in USA, Seth Azubuike, Northeastern University, School of Law; Boston Bar Association; IAPP. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:52 am
” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:27 am
Interesting pending civil action in Grupo Bimbo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
The Court confronted this directly in Hill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
Applicant claims that in Matal v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Here, Meenaxi asserted that it is the prior user of the marks in the USA. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
Turning Point USA at Ark. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [2014]), and requires a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; Wailes v Tel Networks USA, LLC, 116 AD3d 625, 625-626 [2014]). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
Dodge has a post titled “The Surprisingly Broad Implications of Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
AWP USA Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
