Search for: "Martin v. Powers" Results 201 - 220 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Divisional Court (Singh LJ and Holgate J) handed down judgment in the of Liberty v Home Office [2018] EWHC 975 (Admin) declaring that the data retention provisions of Investigatory Powers Act are incompatible with EU law. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
So to say the case left landlords with ‘very little power’ to pursue ground 16 repossessions. is nonsense. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
But as a courtesy to O'Malley, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm by Gabriel Chin
Thus, in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the following statement by the Supreme Court in the 1928 case of Frost v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The full court did not hear the case, as Martin J. was one of the members of the panel of the Court of Appeal that issued the decision under appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:47 pm
Baker says the difference is the product - speech v. nonspeech. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
There is a county court case (Graham v Sand Martin Heights Residents Co Ltd OBQ12347), which has held that the small claims regime trumps the contractual right, but, frankly, I’ve never been persuaded by that. [read post]