Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA" Results 201 - 220 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2014, 5:28 am
  Though styled by many as a challenge to EPA’s judgment, the case is really about the judgment of the High Court itself, as it forces the Court to consider some of the ramifications of its decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
A majority of the Court had made clear, seven years ago in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:58 am by Jody Freeman
 If the Court were to take up petitioners’ Hail Mary invitation to roam beyond the narrowly cabined question presented in the cert. grant, and reconsider Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:59 am by Amanda Leiter
 As the Supreme Court has twice observed, first in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Olivier Theard
  Other petitions requested the court re-examine the landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
It only moved into this area after the Supreme Court ruled in 2007, in the case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While I would have liked the Court to reconsider Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:43 am by Joe Koncelik
How New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Were Triggered for Coal Plants Since the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1146Issue: (1) Whether Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Dwyer
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1146Issue: (1) Whether Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am by Mary Dwyer
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1253Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act and this Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm by WIMS
At least one State, Massachusetts, is currently regulating biogenic carbon dioxide sources at Step Two of the Tailoring Rule. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by Green
But as I read through the Court's opinion, I found myself thinking of Massachusetts v. [read post]