Search for: "Mathews v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
  In upholding the Gwinnett County Trial Court's denial of the certificate, the Georgia Court of Appeals hinged its interpretation of Davenport v State (2011) through the lens of Layfield v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
  In upholding the Gwinnett County Trial Court's denial of the certificate, the Georgia Court of Appeals hinged its interpretation of Davenport v State (2011) through the lens of Layfield v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
David Carson, US Copyright Office: Small claims of all kinds are problems in federal court; one argument that might be helpful is that, at the moment, you have no choice but federal court for copyright claims; often people have state court as an alternative, which may depending on the state be more efficient/faster/cheaper. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Thus (probably) spoke a nineteenth century Irish judge, Sir James Mathew (1830-1908) (pictured). [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm by Matthew Bush
IllinoisDocket: 11-1192Issue(s): (1) Whether the Due Process Clause requires a state or local government to provide a prompt postseizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture hearing and if so, when any such hearing must take place, whether the proper test for the “prompt” aspect of such a proceeding is governed by the three-part due process analysis of Mathews v. [read post]