Search for: "Matter of Brady" Results 201 - 220 of 1,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2007, 3:08 am
Football coaches from time to time get embroiled in lawsuits over contract matters. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 8:00 am
Update: So, Tom responded to this post thusly:I imagine most courts would take a dim view of it, and as I've often said, what does it matter to win one case if costs you your credibility with the court? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:28 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Since there have been so many Brady violations in Illinois (and concerning matters far more serious than this case), I don’t understand why this was chosen as the test case for this area. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
Prosecutors get to pick and choose which laws matter, and the ones that apply to us are critical while the ones that apply to them are just a joke. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
” The defense’s position is that Brady “is not waivable as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:34 pm
Brady for counsel, from the Benjamin Purvin law firm located in Lake Success. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 11:07 am by Goldberg Jones
Stepparenting and bringing distinct families together never goes as smooth and simple as on The Brady Bunch. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:17 pm
So, diligence does matter, and therefore:There is no reliable way to measure the obstructive effect of the alleged Brady violation without knowing what other means of access to the same information were within Wood's ken and available to him. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:56 pm by Matt Bodie
 The NBPA has begun disbanding itself, much as the NFLPA did last spring, and the players will file an antitrust claim against the league -- again, similar to the Brady v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 9:13 am
Nifong" --or false comments to the Court --or any matters relating to the Bar --or any "alleged agreement" between Nifong and Meehan "I'm not sure I really under stand the State Bar's position" re the therefore allegations Constitutional claim of Bar: state bar needs clear, cogent, and convincing evidence Williamson: Is a Brady violation necessary for a violation of Rule 320.18 Witt: No appropriate guidelines, need to look at… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by Nathan
If the evidence does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then it doesn’t matter whether they did it or not, they don’t deserve to be convicted. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
  For example, this ABC News piece discusses how a leading gun control group views the state of the gun wars, with the headline "Gun Control Group Braces for Court Loss: 'We've Lost the Battle on What the 2nd Amendment Means,' Brady Campaign Head Says. [read post]