Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly" Results 201 - 220 of 640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing a recent decision by the Court of Appeals, Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli (30 NY3d 674, in which that court stated that "the requirement that a petitioner demonstrate that a condition was not readily observable in order to demonstrate an 'accident' is inconsistent with our prior case law," the Appellate Division annulled the Comptroller determination, explaining that "substantial evidence does not support the determination that the… [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
   I have been referred to the well‑known authorities of WEA Records v Visions Channel 4 Ltd. [1983] 1 WLR 721 at 724 and Kelly v BBC [2001] Fam 59 at 94 to 95 (Munby J). [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kelly Tucker, a public school teacher in Tift County, engaged in a written debate on Facebook regarding the Black Lives Matter movement. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bobby Chesney and Vladeck posted this week’s National Security Law Podcast, addressing the latest developments in the al-Nashiri military commission proceedings, Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
On the other hand, the issue is so undeniably important as a practical matter, and the courts are so splintered, that the Supreme Court should do something. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:17 am by Doorey
  Should it matter that the employee was only “a little bit drunk”? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
WHY DOES IT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT STUDENT LOANS ARE CONSIDERED CONSUMER DEBTS? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am by William Ford
.), Michael Green and Kelly Magsamen. [read post]