Search for: "Matter of Goldstein" Results 201 - 220 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence may be granted “where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter oflaw” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:06 am
Gerard Comizio, Paul Hastings LLP, on Tuesday, August 9, 2016 Tags: Bank Holding Company Act, Banks, Dodd-Frank Act, Fiduciary duties, Financial institutions, Financial regulation,Securities regulation Corporate Governance by the Numbers Posted by Ann Yerger, EY Center for Board Matters, on Tuesday, August 9, 2016 Tags: Audit committee, Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Engagement, ESG, Executive Compensation, Proxy contests, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals,… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
  [Disclosure:  Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C., which sponsors this blog, filed an amicus brief in support of i4i, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:32 am by SHG
  After Tom Goldstein's painful oral argument, it was a fait accompli. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
Thus, in matters of culture and aesthetics, the distinction between summary judgment and trial is particularly important. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The matter was appealed, and the Appellate Division affirmed this ruling on the basis that “the evidence failed to demonstrate the restrictive covenants WIMA extracted from Goldstein and Murray were actually transferred or assigned to WMA. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Host Committee (in formation):SAMARA BAREND RAOUL BHAVNANI RICHARD BRAND BRYAN CHO JIM CLYNES MATT COWHERD MATT CRANER  ROBERT DONOVAN SAM GOLDSTEIN KEVIN GRAY  THOMAS LaBARBERA MICAH LASHER EVAN LEDERMAN ARTHUR LEOPOLD  JEFF LIPSON DAVID LISTON DIRK McCALL ERIK NEU STEVEN NEWMARK LISSA ROSENTHAL AMANDA RYKOFF HANNAH SHOLL… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:43 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
We answer this question in the affirmative and conclude, pursuant to our recent holding in Matter of Goldstein v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
To make matters worse, at the time, Los Angeles County had no system in place to keep track of whether these jailhouse snitches had been offered immunity or leniency for their testimony. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:48 am
Don’t look for unanimity, writes Bravin: A big question among court watchers like [Akin Gump's Tom] Goldstein: . . . [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:54 pm by Kelly
Goldstein, Philadelphia Tax Attorney Ask the taxgirl: Why Justice Matters (revisited) [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 5:38 pm
  For consideration, please e-mail resumes to Amy Goldstein at agoldstein@grayson-allen.com [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 5:38 pm
  For consideration, please e-mail resumes to Amy Goldstein at agoldstein@grayson-allen.com [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:44 pm
Goldstein recently issued Executive Compensation 2008, a memorandum outlining key recommendations for directors to consider as they address executive compensation matters in the year ahead. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Goldstein Case In the Goldstein case the couple was married in 1944 and a separation judgment was entered on the 17th of May, 1960. [read post]