Search for: "Matter of J A S and E R S"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court DecisionsBy Daniel E. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
David J. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Nov. 18, 2015 Mannion, J.), Judge Malachy E. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Rabb From one text comes many interpretations: e unum pluribus. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Robert J. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Robert J. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Meehan v Good, 2016 ONSC 2110 [54] It was Cardill’s position that once he informed the plaintiffs that he had discovered Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
DeFazio and Sarah E. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
Cummins | January 30, 2020Daniel E. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
Watson, Kory R. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
March 16, 2020 Bowes, J., Olson, J., Stabile, J.) [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 5:09 pm
Barry J. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Dec. 14, 2020 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:33 am
- Posted by John E. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Lehigh Co., June 6, 2014 Reichley, J.), Judge Douglas G. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Lehigh Co., June 6, 2014 Reichley, J.), Judge Douglas G. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:11 am
Henry E. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:03 am
[DELETED] (d) An advertisement that complies with paragraph (e) may contain the following: (1) statements that are reasonably likely to create an expectation about results the lawyer can achieve; (2) statements that compare the lawyer's services with the services of other lawyers; (3) testimonials or endorsements of clients, where not prohibited by paragraph (c)(1), and of former clients; or [DELETED “where not prohibited by paragraph (c)(1)”] (4)… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
Corp. (98 AD3d 848 [1st Dept 2012] [Acosta, J., concurring]), "I would hold that a plaintiff does not have th[e] burden [of disproving the affirmative defense of comparative negligence]. [read post]
