Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 201 - 220
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Does it matter that the nomination is to the Supreme Court rather than to a lower federal court? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
This is the second installment of a short essay on the New Nationalism that I wrote for the forthcoming supplement to the Brest Levinson casebook. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
For the past several years, I've been posting discussion questions from the forthcoming supplement to the Brest Levinson casebook for selected decisions from the past Supreme Court Term.This year, at the request of my colleague Heather Gerken, I wrote an note-- actually more of a short essay-- on the "New Nationalism," an academic movement championed by Heather and her scholarly allies/interlocutors. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
It held that the Elder Abuse Act does not require the existence of a custodial relationship in order for the plaintiff to establish a cause of action for neglect.[2] The court also rejected defendants’ contention that the trial court should determine, as a matter of law, whether defendants’ conduct constituted professional negligence rather than neglect. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:29 am
No matter what the principle, divided political parties have almost always come to ruin, and the recovery has generally taken more than one election cycle. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
“There are always ways to get money to politicians and essentially treat politicians to nice events; the gift limits, they do some work, but there are loopholes,” said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor and president of the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Indeed, this government-friendly approach to the “ample alternative channels” inquiry is sharply inconsistent with this Court’s most recent precedent on the matter, City of Ladue v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:15 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) at the class certification stage through evidence of a lack of price impact from their alleged misstatements. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
Levinson,[iii] prior to the certification of a class, by showing a lack of “price impact. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
Since Sandy Levinson and Mark Graber passed the baton to us in the fall of 2012, we have endeavored to carry forward the interdisciplinary conversation that they envisioned. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:36 pm
House of Representatives approved a resolution yesterday calling on Iran to fulfill its promise of assisting the United States in the case of Robert Levinson. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:28 pm
Illinois ballot access is a matter of Illinois law, not federal law. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:37 pm
Complicating matters further, an Islamist leader of the militant group Jaysh al Islam has been named chief negotiator of the Saudi-backed Syrian opposition group. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
Why does it matter who wrote the essays? [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm
– Boston lawyer Andrea Dunbar of Burns Levinson on the Divorce Law Monitor Cybersecurity Tops SEC Office of Compliance Inspections 2016 Examination Priorities – Boston lawyer Cynthia LaRose of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Matters Did Bill Clinton “sexually harass” Monica Lewinsky? [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
Check out ILN IP Insider’s post on the matter. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
Levinson. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:15 am
The statute also promotes the understanding that the Court resolves the matters before it without regard to political pressure or public opinion. [read post]
