Search for: "Matter of NL" Results 201 - 220 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
I am satisfied that he took into account relevant matters, did not misunderstand the facts, and certainly understood the law. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am by Giles Peaker
Zaman v London Borough of Waltham Forest and Uduezue v Bexley LBC (2023) EWCA Civ 322 These were two joined second appeals from section 204 appeals, both on the issue of whether the local authorities had lawfully discharged duty following decisions that ‘out of borough’ private sector accommodation was suitable for the applicants. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
So, let’s have a look at the respective provisions in DE, GB, FR, NL, IT and ES, before finally turning to Norway, where there has recently been an interesting new development. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm by Michael Oykhman
This third category of “other fraudulent means” was defined in R v Mercer, 1998 CanLII 8029 (NL CA) to include “means which are not in the nature of deceit or falsehood but encompass all other means which can be stigmatized as dishonest. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm by Michael Oykhman
This third category of “other fraudulent means” was defined in R v Mercer, 1998 CanLII 8029 (NL CA) to include “means which are not in the nature of deceit or falsehood but encompass all other means which can be stigmatized as dishonest. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
  NL’s post below deals with the interesting other issue about section 2 in relation to collateral contracts. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
Contributory Infringement for Cyber Squatting: In another surprising ruling relating to contributory infringement, the central district of California held that a domain proxy service can be held liable for cyber squatting in Solid Host, NL v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:35 pm by Giles Peaker
NL)(c) Each court centre will refer Accelerated Possession Claims to a Judge at manageable frequency. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:57 pm by David Lillesand
Starting on or about May 1995, members of this group in all States will get special Medicaid referral notice paragraphs numbers 1140 and 1141 (NL 00804.110) in their automated Notices of PlannedAction when: they lose SSI eligibility due to excess income in a month of title II entitlement; and they are at least age 18; andthe SSI computer record reflects title II continuing income with a Beneficiary Identification Code (BIC) of “C”. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
According to the District Court, “the falling back on the auxiliary requests can, in terms of legal consequences, be equated with the abandonment of EP 679 NL as granted. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by chief
Perhaps we're getting to the crux of the matter here. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:26 am by Michael Oykhman
Common Assault Punishment The sentence that you receive for a conviction of an assault will take into account the individual circumstances of your matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by chief
Perhaps we're getting to the crux of the matter here. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]