Search for: "Matter of NL"
Results 201 - 220
of 254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
nav/quotes/nls/nav (NAV 48.79, -1.17, -2.34%) yesterday reached an agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in which EPA promised to hold a public workshop or hearing to address issues Navistar raised in its federal court appeal of EPA’s certification policies for SCR-equipped diesel powered trucks. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:01 pm
After a rough start to the season, the Stros’ pitching staff has come around to a 3 RSAA (through Friday’s game), which means it’s a slightly above-average NL pitching staff. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
New Post: Weekly Twitter Cache http://goo.gl/fb/1hH4x # Chavez jails judge for ruling, stifles criticism through arrests http://ow.ly/1uziM # Lol RT @olsonleif: Take heart, #astros fans – we still have at least 2 hours to enjoy being tied for 1st in the NL Central. # RT @TexParteBlog: UT law school group offers legal help to artists http://bit.ly/ct9MUF # Ah, ranking season is upon us RT @tonypaganelli: WSJ Law Blog: Is the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
We here at NL pride ourselves on providing comprehensive coverage of housing law (or, at least as comprehensive as six people who do this in their spare time can be) and that includes updates on leasehold property related matters. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:03 am
Just over 780,000 applications for legal assistance were received; applications for criminal matters accounted for 43% while the remainder of the applications were for civil matters (57%). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:23 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:23 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
As a result, I side with JS and against my NL colleague, David Smith; NL's justifiable anger at the drafting of the provisions as interpreted by Tugendhat J in the Draycott case provide an appropriate footnote to the overly self-laudatory comments by Lord Bassam. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
As a result, I side with JS and against my NL colleague, David Smith; NL's justifiable anger at the drafting of the provisions as interpreted by Tugendhat J in the Draycott case provide an appropriate footnote to the overly self-laudatory comments by Lord Bassam. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
Ltd. d/b/a NLS Group v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm
[by NL - our thanks to Neil Wylie, Counsel for the Defendant/Appellant for letting us know about this case.] [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm
[by NL - our thanks to Neil Wylie, Counsel for the Defendant/Appellant for letting us know about this case.] [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
After an earlier appearance before the House of Lords (as it then was), which was reported on by NL here, the House ruled on the meaning of locality and how far it could stretch. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
After an earlier appearance before the House of Lords (as it then was), which was reported on by NL here, the House ruled on the meaning of locality and how far it could stretch. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
That matter is (a) of general public importance and (b) likely to give rise to a much longer judgment than this one. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
That matter is (a) of general public importance and (b) likely to give rise to a much longer judgment than this one. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
Contributory Infringement for Cyber Squatting: In another surprising ruling relating to contributory infringement, the central district of California held that a domain proxy service can be held liable for cyber squatting in Solid Host, NL v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Does it even matter to Derek, given that his looming fiasco of a trial and indiscretions with Maria seem set to sink any chance he may have had at partnership? [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
As NL and I noted, in relation to R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) (links to NL's note), there is a bubbling issue about the extent to which allocations policies need to set out all their terms; it'd be interesting to note whether this issue was canvassed before the CA in this case (hint, hint). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
As NL and I noted, in relation to R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) (links to NL's note), there is a bubbling issue about the extent to which allocations policies need to set out all their terms; it'd be interesting to note whether this issue was canvassed before the CA in this case (hint, hint). [read post]
