Search for: "Matter of Opinion No. 653" Results 201 - 219 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276 (9th Cir. 1981) ("stereotypic impressions of male and female roles do not qualify gender as a [bona fide occupational qualification]"); Diaz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 6:52 pm
 In Res-Care, the Fifth Circuit found that the liability policy at issue did not cover punitive damages under the facts before it as a matter of public policy. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:00 am
We don't think the distinctions are all that great in terms of whether there should be preemption or not, but no matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
First, the subject matter of plaintiff's infringement claim and the subject matter of the petition for cancellation do not arise out of the same "transaction or occurrence. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
“When considering an equal protection challenge in criminal matters,individuals are ‘similarly situated’ only if they are charged with the samecrime or crimes. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Edison Electric Institute (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-653 Case name: Norris v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Lamarque, 427 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 2005), vacated by Carey v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 653 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1995)................................................................................................10 Rutherford v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 653 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1995)................................................................................................10 Rutherford v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
  In his view, the matter was fully litigated as part of the merits of the unfair labor practice issue and insubordinate conduct proven sufficient to justify a refusal to hire would a fortiori justify Lundien's discharge if he were an employee. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
  For a copy of the Commission’s Liability Opinion, please refer to In the Matter of Rambus, Inc., FTC Docket No. 9302, available at [www.ftc.gov] (filed on August 2, 2006). [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 653, 655 (1948); Barnes v. [read post]