Search for: "Matter of Price v Evers" Results 201 - 220 of 1,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 am by Holly Filius
The reduction established by the case of Bielicki v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
There is no particular SEC rule on this issue, but it is instead based on the holding in cases like FTC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
The first and most obvious is commerciality—“whether the user stands to profit from exploitation of the copyrighted material without paying the customary price. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On remand,, if the plaintiffs’ expert testifies that there were no nonfraud impacts on the share price, the burden shifts to the defendant to identify some “significant, firm-specific, nonfraud related information that could have affected the stock price. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Fisher-Price, Inc., 485 F.3d 1157, 1162 (Fed. [read post]