Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh"
Results 201 - 220
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 10:02 am
Justice Swatanter KumarThe Supreme Court in a recent decision, in Balwant Singh v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
Co. v Whitfield,AD3d, 2009 NY Slip Op 02975 [2d Dept 2009]; Singh v Allcity Ins. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:47 pm
Kanhaiya Singh & Anr. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Myriad Genetics, in which the Court is considering whether human genes are patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:33 pm
From Singh v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm
Mr Bharuka, on the other hand, invited our attention to another decision of this Court in Baldev Singh v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm
Dhruv Vijay Singh (Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources) and Mr. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
Disclaimer: I act for both claimants and defendants, including in two of the cases cited above – Monroe v Hopkins & Singh v Weayou. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
Tej Pratap Singh and Ors. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
The recent Simon Singh libel case, although eventually resolved in Dr Singh’s favour, showed how tenuous the protection of free speech can be under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:05 am
"The earlier Jaswant Singh or any citizen in Gujarat challenges the ban under Section 96 Cr.P.C. the better. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
In Keshub Mahindra v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
The Court did not seem to take note of the devolution of constitutional responsibilities and stuck to the age old line taken in Kartar Singh v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:04 pm
In today’s case (Carson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:14 am
Even in the case of Dalbir Singh v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Such arbitrariness is usually avoided through compliance with what have become known as the “Hardial Singh” principles (taken from the judgment of Woolf J in R v Governor o Durham Prison, ex p Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704) – common law requirements that the detention must only be for the purpose of deportation, and that it must only be for a reasonable period in the circumstances. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 18, 2023 Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 18, 2023 Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
Ahuja v. [read post]
