Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 201 - 220 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and was the defendant in His Holiness v Singh. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
”ADDED: I need to see the whole transcript — context matters! [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  He has posts about the cases of Cripps v Vakras and Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation v Di Masi. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
After thinking about the matter a little bit during the first go-round, the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General, who recently recommended the Court deny cert. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
  When up in the courthouse there arose such a clatter; I sprang from my desk to see what was the matter; Had the much-discussed streak ceased to exist? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am by Anita Davies, Matrix
The Court found that the first two issues were matters of trust law and interpretation of the trust deed, and dependent upon interpreting the decision in Attorney General v Mathieson [1907] 2 Ch 383. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
With the noisy midterms firmly behind us, we can at last breathe easy and turn our attention to more pressing matters. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am by INFORRM
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and defendant in His Holiness v Singh, he tweets @singhtwo2 This post originally appeared on the Press Gazette’s Wire Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
DeStefano in Radburn v Singh, Index No. 601902/14 [Sup Ct, Nassau County Aug. 18, 2014], in which the court held that the claims and relief sought in the two lawsuits were not the same, and that notwithstanding the election to purchase in the dissolution case, the plaintiff minority shareholder remained a shareholder with the right to seek enforcement of the shareholders’ agreement and other, common-law and statutory shareholder rights. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by John Bellinger
I will end by noting my friend Bill Dodge’s recent response at Just Security to my post earlier this week about Judge Boasberg’s ruling regarding the immunity of former Indian Prime Minister Singh. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Singh ruled that evidence of which a defendant has knowledge, or should reasonably have known of, is not Brady material. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
  It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
However, after the decision is taken by the Cabinet and the matter is complete or over, the decision and the materials on the basis of which such decision was taken shall be made public under the Act. [read post]