Search for: "Matter of Turner v Turner" Results 201 - 220 of 625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Option 3 is the traditional sentence, which in this matter would be the high term of nine years, plus 10 years for the firearm, plus 10 years for the two prior convictions, and three years for the priors under P.C. 667.5, subsection (b). [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Eric Cervone
In his opinion, he cited the 1994 case Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:11 am
Fields, defendant-respondent NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeParole Board's Failure to Consider Mandated Factor In Executive Law Grants Inmate de Novo Hearing Matter of Turner v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
NFP civil opinions today (1): In the Matter of the Adoption of A.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Even construing all inferences in favor of Zimmerman, he failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Hanson v Turner Constr. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:23 pm by Ezra Rosser
This proposal builds upon the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Turner v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:07 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines you may have missed from Wise Law on Twitter : Discord at US Supreme Court is deep, and personal (Jan Crawford/CBS News) Being your own Perry Mason - More people representing themselves in court Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal over disputed election result Tuesday  Class-action lawsuit filed in wake of deadly mall collapse in Elliot Lake Using and Enduring Power of Attorney to Sever a Joint Tenancy Arab Spring Reveals International Court Flaws For… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
A similar showing might not be required as a First Amendment matter as to speech about matters of purely private concern. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934, 938). [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
That unique treatment amounts to singling out under Turner I and triggers heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment. * DJ Lincoln Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The Burstein principle was reviewed by the Court of Appeal in Turner v News Group Newspapers [2006] EWCA Civ 540. [read post]