Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
  It took no immediate action, however, on the much-awaited case involving the employment practices of the popular discount retailer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am by Sergio Campos
  I want to continuing writing about Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am by Kara Elgersma, Of Counsel
On May 20, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided whether an action instituted by the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia on behalf of the citizens of West Virginia against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corp., The Kroger Co., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreen Co. and Target Stores, Inc. was a class action, removable under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:55 am by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
By Michael Kun, Regina Musolino and Aaron Olsen Since the Supreme Court’s historic ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 18, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Serial No. 86651975 [Section 2(d) refusal of GEORGE for "watches, clocks, jewellery and imitation jewellery" in view of the identical mark registered for "pet collar medallions and charms"]. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the district court fundamentally misapprehended the reach of Wal-MartStores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Adam Santucci
UPDATE: You may have heard the cheers emanating from Bentonville, Arkansas (the location of Wal-Mart's corporate headquarters), and the corporate headquarters of other large employers following the United States Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]