Search for: "Mays v. King County" Results 201 - 220 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2008, 8:08 pm
Plaintiff argued its mark is instead suggestive and, therefore, inherently distinctive, and that it had acquired secondary meaning in any event.Under Local Rule 7(h), defendants need not (and may not) respond unless the court requests that it do so.The case cite is The Christensen Firm v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Shapsis v Kogan ; 2011 NY Slip Op 50014(U) ; Decided on January 7, 2011 Supreme Court, Kings County ; Demarest, J. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  So we see a similar issue in MacLeod v County of Nassau ;2010 NY Slip Op 04344 ;Decided on May 18, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department . [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
(This is a particular bugbear of mine…)   Blagg v Gharbi & Gharbi (Manchester County Court. 11 May 2023. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:28 am by Lisa Baird
San Francisco and Seattle (King County, Washington) have enacted regulations similar to the Alameda County Safe Drug Disposal Ordinance. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well established that summary judgment may be granted only when it is clear that no triable issue of fact exists (Alvarez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:45 pm by John Hochfelder
Her mother, Marilyn Davis, sued the driver and owner and on May 20, 2013, a Kings County jury apportioned liability 65% to the driver and 35% to Mchele. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 8:02 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, Pinellas County has determined that telecommunications towers may coexist with a residential neighborhood. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court defered ruling on the petitioner’s motion to vacate the orders of the Kings County Family Court and requesting temporary custody over B.A.S. during the pendency of these proceedings. [read post]