Search for: "McKinney v. McKinney"
Results 201 - 220
of 648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court ruling on Sackett v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:42 am
McKinney School of Law Anyone familiar with recent Supreme Court patent jurisprudence was perhaps disappointed but certainly not surprised by the Court’s latest decision, Alice Corp. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 8:27 am
The 9th joins the 4th, 5th, 7th and 10th in so holding.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/12/29/14-50528.pdf McKinney v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
Recall the case of U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
" (Governor's Mem, 1980 McKinney's Session Laws of NY, at 1877-1878.) [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
See Leslie v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
In USA v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 8:24 am
5 Mar 2022, 6:29 am
The style of the case is Sun Life Insurance Company of Canada v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:59 am
Charles Wilson of the AP reports today on yesterday's 7th Circuit opinion in the case of FreeEats.com, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:33 am
V. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
[1] Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:02 am
Cos. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:50 am
Westfield v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
McKinney (U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:58 am
12 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
Co. v Babylon Chrysler Plymouth, 45 AD2d at 969; see also Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3019:5, at 210; Travelers Indem. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
Law § 76-d (McKinney 2012)). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court therefore was required to impose a term of imprisonment upon that conviction (Penal Law § 70.08 [3] [c]; § 120.05 [7]), and thus was also required to order a presentence report prior to imposing the bargained-for sentence (see generally People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 238, cert denied 419 US 1122; Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, CPL 390.20). [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 8:28 am
Consider Bowditch v. [read post]