Search for: "Memorandum (1991)" Results 201 - 220 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The fact-findings, undisturbed on the appeal, are that the respondent husband violated the order of protection issued November 7, 1991 in that he made a series of over 300 harassing phone calls commencing on or about December 18, 1991 until the date of the petition, January 22, 1992, and that on March 25, 1992 he appeared at petitioner’s residence. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
West's Ann.Cal.Civ.Code § 1624.[7] KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote 185 Frauds, Statute Of 185VIII Requisites and Sufficiency of Writing 185k114 Signature of Memorandum 185k115.3 Sufficiency of Signature by One Party Only 185k115.3(2) k. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
Even though the Green Tree Parties specifically referenced the 2014 version of the JAMS rules in their memorandum brief in support of their motion to compel arbitration, the House Parties did not object to that version of the rules in the proceedings below. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden's claims, or in the alternative, to dismiss this case (the "Motion to Compel Arbitration"), and filed a memorandum of law in support (the "Def's Mem. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
A decision earlier this month by an upstate appellate court in a corporate dissolution proceeding called Matter of Stevens (Allied Builders, Inc.), 2010 NY Slip Op 05066 (4th Dept June 11, 2010), adds uncertainty to the already fuzzy array of precedents surrounding the question whether the filing of a dissolution petition triggers a mandatory buyback of the petitioner's shares under the provisions of a right of first refusal… [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am by Russell Knight
Williams, 588 NE 2d 983 – Ill: Supreme Court 1991 Oath A witness must be able to effectively take the oath to “tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth” in order to be a competent witness. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
By rescheduling a case instead of relisting, the author of a draft opinion (or any other document – say, a memorandum to the other justices) would have the opportunity to prepare it fully before the case is considered by the entire court. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:34 am
A number of those funds came in prior to 1972, when the definition of income changed and it changed again after 1991. . . . [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Eu (Cal. 1991), the California Supreme Court held that, in the case of legislators, the right to earn pension rights on the same terms begins when the legislators first begin their service, even though legislative terms may have begun and ended since then. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am by MBettman
Tolbert, 60 Ohio St.3d 89 (1991) (Lesser-included offenses are considered the same offense as the greater offense for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause and Blockburger test.) [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nadine Strossen (the President of the ACLU from 1991 to 2008). [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am by admin
Guest post by Richard Elliott Member of the Ontario and New York bars Canada’s Commissioner of Competition (Commissioner) and Parkland Fuel Corporation (Parkland) recently settled their outstanding merger proceedings before the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) in respect of Parkland’s acquisition of Pioneer Energy (the “Parkland” case).[1] Since the case did not proceed to a final decision on the merits, this note considers an unresolved issue emanating from the interim… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm by Andrew Frisch
If you are someone who follows the trends in wage and hour law, you are no doubt aware of the recent proliferation of cases in which exotic dancers or strippers have challenged the seemingly industry wide misclassification of their positions. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
December 7, 1941: A day that will live in infamy – that day, Pearl Harbor was attacked, and American entry into World War II became a guarantee. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
Note:  This post is an abridged version of the article I wrote for the Autumn 2010 issue of Issues in Aviation Law and Policy, which is published by the International Aviation Law Institute of DePaul University College of Law. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See Memorandum Opinion, Case No. 5:04cv124] On February 4, 2005 James Clark's attorney filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. [read post]