Search for: "Michael Ginsburg"
Results 201 - 220
of 775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold Professor of Constitutional Law at The Ohio State University Michael E. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm
* Adam Feldman explores the possible effect on the Supreme Court of replacing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a staunch conservative -- e.g., Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:49 am
” At The National Law Review, Jennifer Theis and Howard Michael look at Iancu v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 5:42 am
* How awesome is Ruth Bader Ginsburg? [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:08 pm
” Michael Schulman has this Talk of the Town item in the December 24, 2018 issue of The New Yorker. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Citing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 82, Ginsburg and Thomas opined that the federal and state governments together comprise a single system of justice for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
When rights holders, for example, hear copyright exceptionalists like Michael Geist talk about “balance” they know it is usually a call to hollow out an exclusive right, or to oppose a right or new remedy, or to argue for a broad new exception or weaker remedies, or for uncompensated uses of copyright materials.[9] But, the concept of balance does not provide any useful guidance for copyright reform any more than balance provides any useful or principled basis for reforms to tax… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” In the most recent episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, “John-Michael Seibler joins Elizabeth Slattery to discuss retired Justice Kennedy lingering at the Court and share holiday gift recommendations for the SCOTUS nerd in your life. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
After the vocational expert in Michael Biestek’s case testified that Biestek could work as a sorter, Biestek’s counsel asked for the data on which the expert’s opinion was based. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am
But as Michael Huston, an assistant to the solicitor general, acknowledged, that approach still would leave lower courts with “difficult questions. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” At The Baltimore Sun, Michael Dresser reports that “Gov. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
Gorsuch and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg both picked up this point in their questioning of Blatt. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
When it does, the Reagan revolution on the courts will finally be complete—just in time for liberals and progressives to convert our numerical majority into a governing majority, and thus to begin our own revolution.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg froze the deposition of Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross in litigation over the legality of the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
[PrawfsBlawg] * And while we're on the subject of media law, Gerard Magliocca has an interesting observation about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the right of publicity. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
” Commentary and analysis on Kavanaugh confirmation come from Garrett Epps for The Atlantic, the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Joan Biskupic for CNN, David French at National Review, Michael Dorf at Take Care, Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice, Julio Gonzales at The Federalist, Katrina Trinko at The Daily Signal, Tom Ginsburg and Aziz Huq at Take Care, Bill Blum at truthdig, Andrew McCarthy in an op-ed at The Hill, and… [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:20 pm
But it is also open to the pervasive game of "whataboutism," as with Justice Ginsburg's openness about her appalled opposition to Donald Trump as a possible president. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:26 am
” Breyer and Ginsburg have also performed in Shakespeare’s plays. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am
In an episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and John-Michael Seibler “preview a few cases the justices will hear in their first week back. [read post]