Search for: "Miller v. Department of Corrections"
Results 201 - 220
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
The Supreme Court in Miller v Pate, 386 US 1, 6-7 (1967) stated:The prosecution deliberately misrepresented the truth. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:31 pm
” Freeman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:46 am
Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2013 U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Let me proceed on the view (whether or not I have convinced everyone that this view is correct) that the NBNP bill violates the plain terms of the 27th Amendment. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Happersett (the 1875 case holding that the Fourteenth Amendment did not afford women the right to vote), and Miller v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
(Compare Constantine V. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Back in 1986, in Ford v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Miller (1993), 13 O.R. (3d) 745 (Ont. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
Specifically, the code says that the list “shall be made available to any officers of the Los Angeles Police Department for inspection. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
The State, in what would have been presumably the last day of their presentation of the case in chief, called Detective John Young of the Delray Beach Police Department to testify. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
• Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
(forthcoming) Amicus brief of the American Legion Miller v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
Sometimes they are recalled and changed.Landa v Blocker 2011 NY Slip Op 06370 ; Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of the result of persistence in appellate work. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
It is within the discretionary power of Supreme Court to award counsel fees and, in doing so, "a court should review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions" ( DeCabrera v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
