Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 12:26 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s recent valuation opinion in Smith v Promontory Financial Group, LLC, Mem. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Citibank argues that the default rate of 24.24% reflected on some of the statements minus the 19.99% factor provided in the card agreement indicates that the applicable prime rate was 4.25%. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:31 am
On April 17, 2019, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a significant appraisal decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery in Verition Partners Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
This happened a few terms ago in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
The bankruptcy court ruled that the trustee could recover $3,952 of the tax refund minus any portion that was part of the sales tax refund on food. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8400000 [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Also, the number of births, minus deaths, during that period is only about 2.8 million. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm
Peters, 311 N.C. 311, 315−16, 317 S.E.2d at 351, 355 (1985). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
The Guiding Principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms follow.Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments ofeconomic reformsPreamble........................................................................................................................................ 3 Scope and purpose......................................................................................................................... 4 Principle 1 − Scope and purpose of… [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 5:14 am
Hillcrest Property, LLP v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:42 am
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:41 am
Implications This case reminds me a lot of the Backpage v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
