Search for: "Mock v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
The reason for that decision was that some angry gamers who disagree (as do I) with the CMA decision used material from the livestream (screenshots) to mock CMA lawyers. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am by Rachit Buch
This right requires a broad interpretation of what counts as “political speech” – even when the speech is sarcastic and mocking. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am by Conor McEvily
Pelkey, holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle, as well as the Court’s cert. grant in Burnside v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:28 am by Ken White
Similarly, because it's a discussion on a political matter of public interest, it's also almost certainly protected from the intentional infliction claim under Snyder v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:54 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff claimed that correctional officers harass, degrade and mock him, continuously take his Kosher food and are attempting to deny him all Kosher meals because he is not picking up his morning meal.In Sherman-Bey v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:28 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Juror Rehabilitation Case The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado issued an opinion in Marko v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
| The protection of TV formats: an Italian mock trial | What can the possible implications of the CJEU Pirate Bay decision be? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Plaintiff next filed a successive Rule 3.851 motion to vacate sentence or stay execution in the state trial court raising two claims of newly discovered evidence, one regarding the testimony of the State's expert at the penalty phase and one challenging Florida's method of lethal injection based on notes from mock execution training conducted in July of 2007. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
” At this blog, Alan Horowitz analyzes last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 12:27 am by INFORRM
It was not necessary to prove that the publication had influenced criminal proceedings, the risk of influence justified the adoption of deterrent measures such as the prohibition of the disclosure of secret information [70] (v)  Infringement of accused’s private life The Court stated that a balance should be maintained between Article 8 and Article 10. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Representing the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]