Search for: "Mosley v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Sienna Miller v News Group. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Jack Straw has subsequently stated that he is “hopeful” that the legislation would be saved in a vote next Tuesday. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  The list of witnesses is available here and includes Baroness Onora O’Neill, Philip Coppel QC, Claire Enders, Max Mosley, Dr Damian Tambini and Professor Steven Barnett. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by INFORRM
Mosley’s… S&M sessions did not involve a matter of public interest. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Press Gazette reports that Max Mosley has accused the Times of ‘fake news’ over a report which wrongly stated that his son committed suicide. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am by INFORRM
At a time when the courts are increasingly having to address complex data protection arguments (see, for example, Mosley, Hegglin and Vidal-Hall) , we should not forgot how useful a subject access request can be in obtaining pre-action disclosure, enabling an individual to see whether s/he has a legitimate basis for issuing a claim in due course. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
  Max Mosley’s evidence that only the richest one per cent can take on the newspapers was widely reported. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am by INFORRM
’ Fourthly, and relatedly, the response puts the greatest emphasis on the recipient’s emotions as evidence of the wrong requiring state intervention. [read post]