Search for: "Motion" Results 201 - 220 of 152,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
On June 12, 2024, the Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its decision in Heath v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
On June 12, 2024, the Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its decision in Heath v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:41 am by sim1koh2
Filing a Motion: The parent seeking modification must file a motion with the court that issued the original support order. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
NO DUTY TO CONDUCT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS OF ONE’S HOMEAfter AMWP, Inc. suffered water damage due to the failure of a “flexible water supply line” that was situated in an upstairs neighbor’s master bedroom, he filed a lawsuit with the New York County Supreme Court, and the defendant-neighbor later asked that court for pre-trial dismissal of AMWP’s “negligence” and “gross negligence” claims.While the defendant wasn’t aware of the supply line… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:47 am by Will Newman
But some motions need to be decided in a hurry, or the law that allows the motion requires a special procedure for the motion. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:35 am by Chris Castle
Strong copyright on the data side will also set in motion real competition for access to valuable works for datasets – putting market forces to work to set prices and terms for licensing these works that reward creators and steer rights and access to the developers and innovators who value them the most. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In an action to recover damages for alleged legal malpractice, pro se plaintiff moves for an order granting default judgment against Russo & Gould LLP and Russo & Toner LLP (collectively, Russo defendants) (Motion Seq. 1), Russo defendants cross-move for an order extending their time to appear in the action (Motion Seq. 2), and Daniel M. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Background (based on the outline provided by the DSC’s decisions)  X (appellant) obtained a judgment in the United States against Y (appellee), which then sought to enforce it in Canada (Ontario) via a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Hyland Hunt
Circuit rejected Petrobras’s FSIA motion to dismiss, finding the investment firm had sufficiently alleged the fraud caused a direct effect in the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 5:35 pm
  Certainly that is not unknown in the liberal democratic West where, for example, it has become fashionable to instill in knowledge producers and transmitters the motion that knowledge is not worth cultivating unless it has an impact aligned with state policy goals  (in the US see eg here).2. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On12 June 2024  the Supreme Court handed down the long-awaited judgement in the case of George v Cannell  [2024] UKSC 19. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm by Andrew Delaney
Father filed a motion arguing that the court couldn't have the order just change automatically based on some future event. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Weapons charges — Motion to suppress A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found Appellant Keith Lewis guilty of illegal possession of a firearm after being convicted of a disqualifying crime and related offenses, wearing/carrying/transporting a loaded handgun, illegal possession of ammunition, and fleeing and eluding. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:13 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Drug and weapon charges — Motion to suppress Brandon E. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
A successful motion would moot NAD’s decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 12:13 pm by Arfaa Law Group
Consequently, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
Judge Leonie Brinkema granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial and denied CACI’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Although the court did not make a final determination on that issue, it held that the plaintiffs had sufficiently established the existence of a non-ratable benefit for purposes of withstanding a motion to dismiss. [read post]