Search for: "Murray v. Williams" Results 201 - 220 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am by Calvin TerBeek
This was not a Scalian speech arguing for originalism, but more in the spirit of William F. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am by Chimene Keitner
The absence of functional immunity was confirmed by IMF spokesman William Murray, who has indicated that DSK's immunities "are limited and are not applicable to this case. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Nessim MezrahiStephen SigristOne of the perennial securities class action litigation issues is the question of how courts should view plaintiff’s allegations made in reliance on short seller reports. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Ralston Professor of International Law Boalt Hall University of California at Berkeley William Carney Charles Howard Candler Professor Emory Law School Stephen Choi Murray and Kathleen Bring Professor of Law New York University School of Law John C. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
As Judge Williams of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
For example, in Jackson v Jackson, 2008 CanLii 3222 (ON SC), in the context of a high conflict dispute, Justice Murray held that a good lawyer will “attempt to minimize conflict while achieving appropriate results for their clients informed by the applicable legal principles including, the best interests of the children” (at para 11). [read post]