Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 201 - 220 of 3,404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 2:00 pm by beng
For example, the Texas Supreme Court ruled on June 30, 2023 that the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act does not cover workers with morbid obesity unless their obesity is due to another underlying condition. . [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Sam L. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Sam L. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
She previously said that she did not understand why we needed a Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
., the Delaware Supreme Court finally addressed the longstanding debate over the validity of the Blasius doctrine. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:00 am by Gene Takagi
Read more State of Nonprofits 2023: What Funders Need to Know #research Alex Daniels: Supreme Court Could Set Back Philanthropy’s Racial-Diversity Efforts With Affirmative-Action Ruling [Ed. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:52 am by jonathanturley
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) have questioned the need for a Supreme Court, the public retains its faith and fealty to the Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Supreme Court bases insider trading doctrine on common law fiduciary duties that govern corporate managers and boards of directors.[10] As for how those fiduciary duties operate to stem illicit insider trading, the Supreme Court imposes a special disclosure obligation not found in other corporate contexts. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Siracusano,[16] in 2011, the Supreme Court, speaking through Justice Sotomayor, wandered into a discussion, irrelevant to its holding, whether statistical significance was necessary for a determination of the causality of an association: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
And when the Bronx County Supreme Court granted the defendant’s dismissal request an appeal followed.On its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that documentary evidence attached to the defendant’s motion reinforced that M.S. didn't have the financial ability to close the deal, either by the “time of the essence” closing date, or the later “final closing date. [read post]