Search for: "NIXON v. ROBERTS"
Results 201 - 220
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Those two cases were decided, it so happens, immediately after President Nixon repopulated the Court in the early 1970s.[11] That in itself is telling. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Seung Min Kim report that “by the close of the four-day hearings, some Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee seemed resigned to Kavanaugh’s confirmation. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:56 am
Nixon declined, and Jaworski decided not to issue a subpoena. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:47 pm
When the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm
But it certainly makes Judge Kavanaugh’s views on United States v Nixon worth exploring in great detail during his Senate confirmation hearing. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:02 pm
Nixon should worry Robert Mueller. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Judge Brett M. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
” President Richard Nixon had first nominated Clement Haynesworth and then G. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:44 pm
There is not much antecedent for that in the Roberts Court or any other. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Martin, “The Life and Career of Justice Robert H. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Again, the president is not above the law (as the dissenters in Nixon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:17 am
” More recently, the court in its 1974 decision in Schick v. [read post]
