Search for: "Nation v Jacobs"
Results 201 - 220
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Next up: two-time relist Jacobs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Pollard shared an executive order issued by President Biden, which declares a national emergency to deal with the issues of wrongfully detained U.S. nationals and hostage-taking abroad, and reinforces existing means of deterring and imposing costs on those responsible for wrongful detention and hostage-taking. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
Jacob Rowbottom (late of Cambridge, now of Oxford) has written a fascinating article on ‘low level digital speech’. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
Simpson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
David Priess and Jacob Schulz encouraged readers to apply to be a Lawfare Institute research assistant. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast in which they discussed recent national security law news and debates: Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
Yesterday Noel Canning, a Yakima, Washington, bottling company, filed its brief in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
Writing for the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro notes that “[a]dvocates for those with intellectual disabilities are applauding the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 am
And Robin Bravender and Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire report on the grant in “an Alaska moose hunter’s challenge to a federal ban on using hovercraft on National Park Service waterways. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy Jacobs discusses the possible impact that Clapper v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC noted that it could have done so, but the prorogation would have ended on the same date. 15:50: Lord Keen QC refers to standing order 13 which provides that if the House of Commons is in recess can only be recalled if the Executive call for it and only if the Speaker of the House considered it was in the national interest. [read post]
