Search for: "National Immigrant Justice Center v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 201 - 220
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
§ 1101(a)(43)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act – and therefore constitutes grounds for mandatory removal. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin discusses the Justice Department’s effort to strengthen its case in Jennings v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Justice’s (DOJ) recent announcement that it will phase out the use of private prisons. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm
” The National Immigration Law Center quickly issued a statement supporting the administration’s bid for rehearing: “The Supreme Court failed millions of immigrant families, and our country as a whole, when it deadlocked in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
From the onset of United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:21 am
The Immigration and Naturalization Service records reproduced herein relate to efforts to revoke the citizenship of certain Indians naturalized as U.S. citizens, as well as to general efforts to exclude Indians from admission to the United States and Canada. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Justice Alito asks him how it is possible to “lawfully work in the United States without lawfully being in the United States? [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
–stage amicus brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The ACLJ is planning to file an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
That explains why United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
” Briefly: In a podcast for the National Constitution Center, Burt Neuborne and John Inazu preview next week’s oral arguments in the First Amendment case Heffernan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm
Department of State said that “while the United States supported Turkey's right to defend its airspace, it was important now for Ankara and Moscow to take steps to de-escalate the tensions on both sides. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
Fortunately, there are dozens of U.S. databases that will support and assist even this kind of limited vetting within: the State Department; the Department of Homeland Security; the National Counterterrorism Center; the Terrorist Screening Center; the FBI, the intelligence community and the Department of Defense. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
The New York Times reports that the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s so called “Torture Report” has gone unread in several federal agencies, including the Pentagon, State Department, and CIA, at the direction of the Department of Justice. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
United States reaches the Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
The Final Regulation redefining the term “spouse” for purposes of the FMLA is one of a host of changes to federal employment, tax, immigration and other regulations and enforcement policies announced by the Obama Administration in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
