Search for: "New Concept Construction, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm by Jason Rantanen
These cases replaced the longstanding patent eligibility standard with a new one requiring, in particular, a so-called “inventive concept. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 [1] This Court has developed a new awareness and understanding of a category of vexatious litigant. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
  A new decision by the British Columbia Supreme Court in Giustra v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
June 27, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the tolling rule established by the United States Supreme Court in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:11 pm
  See Evans Cooling Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In a final paragraph, Justice Hoffman disposed of the constructive trust claim as alleged by Scaglia only for lack of standing, leaving the claim to survive as alleged by Freedom, and the applicable law being that of New York. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 4:33 am
CH2M Hill, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 798, the California Supreme Court expressed the concept of liberal construction this way: In light of the legislative directive that the FEHA be liberally construed to safeguard the employee's right to hold employment without experiencing discrimination , section 12960 should not be interpreted to impose serious practical difficulties on an employee's ability to vindicate this right through litigation if it can reasonably be… [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
§101, of course, states that patents are available for "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof[.] [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Graffeo goes on to explain that these concepts were codified in UPA § 31 through its use of the phrase “definite term or particular undertaking,” which was then incorporated in Partnership Law § 62(1)(b) upon New York’s adoption of the UPA in 1919. [read post]