Search for: "New Jersey v. Jones" Results 201 - 220 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 3:37 pm by Lorene Park
The court ruled that a jury would have to determine whether he was subjected to a different grooming standard based on his sexual orientation in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (Falcon v Continental Airlines). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Earlier this year, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled under its state constitution that police needed a search warrant to obtain cell site records since the expectation of privacy in a person's location is not extinguished merely because a cell phone company has the cell site records. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am by Doug B.
  In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:53 am by Robert A. Epstein
Robert practices in the firm’s Roseland, New Jersey office and can be reached at (973) 994-7526, or repstein@foxrothschild.com. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
Katzin In 2009 and 2010, a string of similarly conducted burglaries hit Rite Aid stores in Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm by Tom Webley
This holding was in direct conflict with the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling that warrants are required for cell phone location data, which we previously analyzed. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The ruling blocked federal prosecutors’ use of evidence that had been obtained from three Philadelphia brothers, linking them to a string of burglaries at Rite Aid drugstores in Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled earlier this summer that police need a search warrant to obtain historical cell site records. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am by Eric
This is another thedirty case, and it's another puzzling Section 230 loss like the Jones v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
"Avatar" (7) "Beavis and Butt-Head" (3) "Brave New World" (8) "Coffee and Cigarettes" (7) "Dobie Gillis" (10) "Dr. [read post]