Search for: "New York Central R. Co. v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
A central goal of Sarbanes-Oxley is the accurate valuation and protection of a company’s assets. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
A discussion of the history of corporate criminal liability would be too detailed for this post, but in its most simplistic form, ever since the 1909 case of New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
It is, therefore, relevant to note that so much was the value attached to the precedent of the highest court that in The London Street Tramways Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
Substantive versus Procedural Theories of Private Judging Christopher R. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
The Court stated that “[r]ecognition of disparate-impact claims is consistent with the FHA’s central purpose. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Director of the SEC Enforcement Division from 1974 to 1981; general counsel to the Central Intelligence Agency from 1981 to 1986; and U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
The citation read: “See generally R. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
