Search for: "Nicholas v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 1,397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
Harwood Lloyd, LLC130 Main StreetHackensack, NJ 07601Counsel for Defendant, Nicholas MandorloDaniel J. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
Ambassador to NATO Nicholas Burns to convince other Bush administration officials that having the NATO alliance formally invoke the mutual defense clause was important. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
 In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The court accordingly dismissed the complaint and denied leave to amend (Moniodes v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Prepared by Nicholas Anderson, summer intern at Woods, LaFortune LLP (2nd year student in University of Ottawa Law School/ Carleton University joint JD/MA program). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:25 pm by Unreported Opinions
The State alleged that the defendants arranged through a middleman, Jeane Juste, to sell 21 pounds of marijuana to Brunson and ... [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am by Mark Summerfield
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am by Mark Summerfield
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am by NCC Staff
The Next Major Challenge to the Affordable Care Act By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley discusses Kelley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]