Search for: "Norwich University" Results 201 - 220 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO –       09039-21 Sadler v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation –       09182-21 Cassidy v Jersey Evening Post, 2 Privacy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation –       10662-21 Champion v Kentish Gazette, 9 Reporting of… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
 The judgment concerned applications by each of the plaintiffs in their respective proceedings for “Norwich Pharmacal” type orders against both defendants, seeking disclosure of the identity of, or information in connection with, Twitter accounts which the plaintiffs allege have defamed them. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The requirements and safeguards to compel innocent third parties to identify defendants (a Norwich order) are well established. [1] The requirements and safeguards to compel innocent third parties to block a web site are not well established. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  There are fourteen before the courts at present, with “Norwich Pharmacal” orders having been made on Friday 18 March 2011 in two further potential actions, by Tessa Jowell MP and by Lee Chapman, Leslie Ash and their children. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 12:19 am by David Pocklington
About what did a member of the House of Bishops said “Thank you, but we should have done more”  The Bishop of Norwich, Graham Usher, lead bishop for Environmental Affairs, in his reflection on COP28. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
Michael Birnhack (Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University) has a paper on “A Quest for a Theory of Privacy: Context and Control (Jurimetrics, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2011). [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 20 May 2011, it was reported that a Norwich Pharmacal application had been made against Twitter by an anonymous claimant. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Adam Wagner
Reprieve is calling for three major changes to the paper:   The proposed ban on Norwich Pharmacal applications must be dropped, to ensure that any Government involvement in wrongdoing remains reviewable by a court In civil cases, the current system of Public Interest Immunity (PII) is very effective and does not need to be changed Where special advocates are used, they must be allowed to take instructions from their client to ensure a fair and balanced trial • The… [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Charbonneau, 2016 BCSC 625 https://t.co/t62ypQ9IHB -> Interim injunction in patent case refused in University of California v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10348-22 Malster v… [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The most important judgment of the week was in the case of Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2015] EWCA Civ 1176). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
New Issued cases Between 18 December 2023 and 9 January 2024 there were three new cases issued in the Media and Communications List, including 2 defamation cases and one Norwich Pharmacal application. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
The defamation dispute relates to an accusation of sexual harassment on university campuses, in which the claimant was not named but was readily identifiable. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Nicola Brookes, 45, from Brighton, has obtained a Norwich Pharmacal Order to compel Facebook to supply details of online users who set up a fake Facebook profile in her name, according to her solicitors Bains Cohen. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Copyright threats and lawsuits against individuals have been around in Canada since 2004, when they were rejected by the federal court. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
New Issued Cases There were three defamation (libel and slander) claims, three Breach of Confidence claims, one Data Protection claim and one Norwich Pharmacal Order application filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:51 am by David Pocklington
There is nothing in Christian doctrine suggesting that any spiritual benefit could follow from such treatment of the remains of the dead; on the contrary, the principle of the permanence of the committal of remains to the earth, the requirement to treat such remains with dignity, and the near-universal Christian practice to maintain the separation and identification of remains where possible, all tend against allowing this Petition. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
Haven's home in Norwich was cited in June for not t [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
We have a post from David Smith on HMO fees in Oxford and getting your money back,  and I write about Davids successful HMO Workshop in Norwich. [read post]