Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 3:16 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
In another case, DOT v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm
Hodges, same-sex couples could marry in 37 states; now that right reaches across the entire United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
United States, the court curbed a massive prosecutorial overreach, ruling that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was not violated when a fisherman tossed undersized grouper overboard in an effort to skirt federal commercial fishing regulations. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm
United States: Is throwing a fish overboard a violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was supposed to be about reforming financial institutions? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
Her Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claim was also dismissed, and a third claim must be arbitrated (Wiggins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
In its May 28th, 2015 decision in Rhinehimer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
In its May 28th, 2015 decision in Rhinehimer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:11 pm
Kansas State University (10th Cir., May 27, 2015) (holding that Title VII's verification requirement is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to a Title VII claim)Sarbanes-OxleyLevi v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:17 am
The state’s high court also found it significant that FCPA enforcement actions have increased in the last decade after the DOJ made enforcement a priority in the post-Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley era. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Lawson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
(Backer, Larry Catá, "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Federalizing Norms for Officer, Lawyer and Accountant Behavior. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
Burwell Supreme Court Oral Argument Read Transcript of King v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:06 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:58 am
In its recent ruling in Yates v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
